Methodology

How we rate matched betting sites

Scores are editorial, structured, and designed to be updated when offers, terms, pricing, support, affiliate status, or safety information changes.

Transparent ranking

How the editorial score is weighted

Scores are editorial and evidence-led. Commercial relationships can affect which partners are available, but the criteria and cautions remain visible.

Offer value

15%

Matched betting usefulness

15%

Exchange compatibility

10%

Odds quality

10%

Withdrawal reliability

10%

Tracking clarity

10%

Account-limit risk

Beginner fit

Support

Safety controls

Editorial rules

Reviews must be original and cannot copy competitor wording.
No page should describe matched betting as guaranteed income.
Affiliate relationships must be disclosed near commercial links.
Current terms, liquidity, commission, and eligibility matter more than headline bonus size.
Public alert pages must never expose private bet details or account tokens.

Criteria weights

Offer value: 15% of the editorial model.
Matched betting usefulness: 15% of the editorial model.
Exchange compatibility: 10% of the editorial model.
Odds quality: 10% of the editorial model.
Withdrawal reliability: 10% of the editorial model.
Tracking clarity: 10% of the editorial model.
Account-limit risk: 8% of the editorial model.
Beginner fit: 8% of the editorial model.
Support: 7% of the editorial model.
Safety controls: 7% of the editorial model.